Pointing Hand
Our content is reader-supported. We may receive commissions on purchases made through links on our site. Consider becoming a member to support local journalism.

Democrats’ spending bill will punish these small businesses

Shout out: District Attorney Larry Krasner recently said the city is not experiencing a “crisis of crime.” Is Krasner right? Or is the city experiencing a “crisis of crime”? Send your thoughts to voices@philadelphiaweekly.com.

Democratic lawmakers are touting a component of their budget bill that would help small businesses. And indeed, some entrepreneurs will be happy to learn about the $25 billion proposal, which would provide small enterprises with new financing, training, and help with federal contracts.

But it’s misleading of legislators to suggest that their massive spending package is small business-friendly. They are being quiet about other measures that would impact small businesses, such as a provision that would decimate hundreds of biotech startups – cutting their revenues and even forcing some to close their doors.

Democrats are still working to include a provision in the spending bill that would impose price controls on drugs.

This would empower the federal government to dictate what Medicare pays biopharmaceutical companies for their products. This is supposed to save the federal government money, and thereby help finance the many other programs under the spending bill.

But that’s not the full picture. Nearly two decades ago, bipartisan legislation established Medicare’s Part D, through which competing private insurers cover outpatient prescription drugs for seniors. To promote a fair and healthy marketplace, the legislation included a non-interference clause, which barred the government from getting involved in price negotiations.

The legislation would do away with that non-interference clause, suddenly allowing the government to dictate price. The impact on business would be enormous.

As a percentage of revenue, drug makers spend more on research and development than other industries – an average of 23% across the sector. Facing price controls, though, drug companies would be forced to cut spending.

Large pharmaceutical companies might be able to weather the storm, albeit with massive reductions in research and development. But many small biotech firms would not survive repeal of the non-interference clause. These younger startups rely on the chance of revenue from future drug sales to attract investment, get off the ground, and stay afloat. According to a new white paper from a coalition of life-science funders, investment into rare diseases and specialty medicines would drop to nearly zero if price-control legislation passed.

On top of this blow to patients, the economic impact would be devastating. According to research from earlier this year, implementing price controls in the United States would stamp out nearly 200,000 jobs in the biopharmaceutical industry, and approximately 1 million overall.

Democrats may talk the talk on small business, and their proposed fund to help entrepreneurs could help some of these businesses. But if their spending bill also slashes income to a whole industry with government price controls, this could wipe out many of our nation’s most innovative small companies. If that happens, not only will small businesses pay a steep price, but also our nation’s health care consumers.

Karen Kerrigan is president and CEO of the Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council. This piece originally ran in Townhall.

If you read this story and liked it, consider joining altPhilly, our membership program that offers exclusive content, instant access to the editor and awesome perks for like-minded Philadelphians. At PW, our coverage goes against the grain of the local mainstream media.

Join altPhilly Now
Learn More
    Enjoying Philly Weekly?Consider joining altPhilly, an exclusive community with access to members-only content and more. Learn More